American response to the Japanese military culture

Introduction

The effects of war are undesired, and as well they are undeserved. They are detrimental, and they are likely to have ripple effects that would count for generations. As such vast efforts are put forth in the maintenance of peace. However, in the times of need, the consequence are to be forgone to protect the integrity, sovereignty and superiority of a nation n the global scene. As such the Ripples of Battle, a Book by authored Victor Davis Hanson illustrate a broad range of cultural as well as military history to offer the reader, the necessary point of view to make independent conclusions.

The book in insight on the better ways to approach the battlefront in a move to protect the battle campaigns of a state. The US is first losses get likened to the one that occurred in Ancient Greece. The Athenians in the 424 BC got defeated at Delium, and the only chance they had was that of a comeback was a surprise. Therefore they had to act and correct the miscalculations by initiating tactical battle change and advancement. The Americans after the loss of their Southern tactical strategist by the name Albert Sidney Johnson got faced with massive losses, and it called for immediate and if necessary ruthless actions so as to win the war. The Northern Victory under the Heir William Tecumseh Sherman as well worked well for the battle campaign and it aided in the reduction of infantry. The Japanese government proved a low tolerance to a democratic government, and as such, there was vast advocating for total war to guarantee success for the Mainland and Island Japan in the war. However, the move was costly, and it was one of the most difficult times in the context of history with the notion of protecting the interests of any advancing unit.

As illustrated, the War of Pacific in which the Japanese forces faced the American, there was a significant illustration of total salvage. The most notable areas where the animosity bloomed was in Okinawa as well as in Saipan, and it resulted to the Americans, making decisions that would affect every political and military tactic every applied.  The US role in the war as of 1944, showed an act of response to the atrocity that got popularized in honor of the governing Emperor. They are well caused the US to act as they did in a move to protect the further loss of lives on both sides with surprises attacks. The decision to drop bombs in the country as well illustrated that the country United States of America were for willing to stop the war on both sides. They were preventing further war campaigns such as surprise invasions by troops commanded by General Yoshisugu Saito, A Japanese Lieutenant, who as well advocated self-massacre regarded as Shudan Jiketsu which as well did refer to as compulsory and as well self-destruction or suicide.  The move as such curbed the vast belief for the mentality and helped counter the idea of complete loyalty to the emperor as well as the presence of some installed Imperial Japanese military service personnel who advocated for the propagandas.

In the modern context, the American invasion as well can be supported areas where the locals have a colonized central believe. It as well would work the best in areas where the nation would like to eliminate some extremity groups that are consumed by an unwarranted belief system. It would as well be critical in the fight against terrorism a common conundrum in the modern age and era. In modern context one of the long-term strategies that could get applied in everyday context is the requirement of total disarmament of the hardliners in the enemy territory. It would work well since the tools to push for and advocate for war would at first be eliminated from the citizenry and as such reducing any chances for encouraging the fights.  It as well could function best when the motives are the propagation of terror and as well save lives on both sides. Some of the suicide bombers, for instance, are forced volunteers and the removal of the arms from those in power would ensure and guarantee that they got safeguarded from such extremities. A long-term solution to the predicament is the education of children from the extremists’ regions. Education whether formal as well as informal is the answer to the central thinking.  It changes thinking mechanisms, visions, goals, orientations and the social believes that one is born to and they indulge in protecting. It would become a handy tool is consistently applied for the long term.

Get a brand-new guide on essay writing

Everything you need to get A+ this semester!

Get it

By continuing, you agree to the Terms And conditions and Privacy policy

The download will start within seconds. Good luck!

Download