In September of 2015, it was found that different models of Volkswagen (around 480,000) vehicles had a program called a ‘Defeat Device introduced to trick the Environmental Protection Agency’s discharges test into influencing the vehicles to appear to be more naturally friendly than they were actually. The product detected when the vehicle was in emanations testing and initiated the hardware that decreased outflows. The product additionally turned down the hardware amid general driving and expanded emanations far over the EPA’s legitimate norms.
The organization’s moral commitment is to redress the issue as well as to acknowledge fault. Volkswagen’s CEO Matthias Mueller expressed that Volkswagen did not mislead U.S. controllers and said it was a misconception of U.S. law that prompted the issue. However, data has become visible that the previous CEO Martin Winterkorn thought about the product introduced in the vehicles in 2014 yet kept on introducing this gadget until 2015. It is indistinct what some high positioning authorities with Volkswagen knew, and it is trusted the choice to introduce these gadgets was made over ten years prior. Volkswagen’s endeavor to recapture its validity and remake their notoriety was dreary. Mueller issued an open statement of regret yet did as such three months after this disclosure was made. By saying that the issue was a misconception of U.S. laws they are neglecting to acknowledge obligation. He neglected to give points of interest of the how they anticipate settling the vehicles that have just been sold which may leave customers as well as investors uncertain of what their arrangement of activity might be.
We can do it today.
Notably, although the direct linkage between foreign trade, the environment, and economic growth is ambiguous, the linkage between these features is determinable by estimation of the economic growth levels. The international trade that involves importing and exporting of goods and services is a major attribute to the growth of the economic growth. However, the interdependence of these factors is affected by the rapid global pollution that is mainly caused by the high number of private transport besides the industrial gases (Lau 492). These factors lead to the emission of greenhouse gases mainly composed of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide and fluorinated gases.
According to researchers in this sector, there is a correlation between the environmental states and the economy of the countries. In the developed countries such as the United States of America, Europe, and China the rate of emission of the greenhouse gases is very high compared to the developing and the developing countries. This shows that the pollution which is caused by the exploitation of the resources, the high number of industries and consequently the high number of private cars also shows a high rate of economic growth factor (Hill et al. 35). The foreign trade; importing and exporting of goods have seen to attribute mostly in the air pollutants consumed in these countries. Relocation of the emissions, reduction of the use of private transport and industrial pollutants to the account of base consumption, the trade partner’s emissions would be much higher. A good example of this is in 2006 when the united states of America emissions for SO2, NO2, and CO2 would be 19% higher if there were an embodiment of the emissions involved in its trade with China.
The variance in the ratio of the pollutant to carbon dioxide that is emitted by the vehicles and industrial emissions in China and the United States of America is an indication of the possibility to reduce the emission of these production gases. The reduction would depend on the readiness of China to enhance the efficiency of energy and deploy emission control technologies which are more effective. The improvement on the models of the vehicles and the type of oil they consume and the treatment of the gaseous emissions from the industries would significantly improve the quality of air and on the other hand, provide a healthy ground for international trade with other countries.
Countries have a responsibility of considering the international corporations to reduce the transboundary transportation of air by the confrontation of questioning who would be responsible for the emissions in this process of goods high production rates to satisfy the customer demands of the other country. Either it is using the production of low-cost vehicles or setting of many industries to satisfy high goods demands. Moreover, the polluting industries that are operating worldwide supply a large proportion of the global consumption through the international trade (Kohler and Marcel 1045). The sustainment of current trading system and on the other hand minimizing the transboundary air pollution besides other environmental impacts will most likely require international agreements informed by the consumption-based accounting of the air pollutants emissions as well as the atmospheric transport modeling of air pollution. Advancement of the vehicles is the most important step that should be taken because every other person in this generation prefers driving in a private car for whatever instances.
- Hill, Charles WL, Thomas Cronk, and Rumintha Wickramasekera. Global business today. McGraw-Hill Education (Australia), 2013.
- Kohler, Marcel. “CO 2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade: a South African perspective.” Energy Policy 63 (2013): 1042-1050.
- Lau, Lin-Sea, Chee-Keong Choong, and Yoke-Kee Eng. “Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter?” Energy Policy 68 (2014): 490-497.