Table of Contents
Underwater wireless communications is data transmission that is in an unguided water environment effected by various wireless carriers such as acoustic wave, radio-frequency (RF) wave and optical wave. The underwater optical wireless communication (UOWC) usually offers much higher transmission bandwidth at a higher data rate. The technology involves various approaches as well as challenges in their design as well as implementation of UOWC.
with any paper
About 70 percent of the earth surface is always covered with water leading to the humans’ exploration of the oceans. This has brought about a growing interest in extensive research of ocean exploration system. The research revealed the underwater wireless communication technology that facilitates the awareness of ocean exploration systems thereby attracting more attention (Hua Yu et al, 2014). The wireless information transmission that is done through the ocean is an enabling technology for the future development of ocean monitoring systems and sensor networks. The underwater wireless sensing systems are envisage for stand-alone controls of autonomous underwater vehicles (Berger, et al, 2010).
Underwater communications technologies
There are various applications of underwater networks such as terrestrial sensor networks. These are facilitated by various types of underwater communication technologies such as acoustic wave, radio-frequency (RF) wave and optical wave. There are advantages as well as disadvantages associated with underwater communications technologies.
Advantages and disadvantages of underwater communications technologies
|Underwater communications technologies||Advantages||Disadvantages|
There are several techniques that have been developed to allow different stations to successfully share the resource but in separate signals coexisting in a common medium. In the design of resource-sharing system for underwater networks, we need to keep in mind the peculiar characteristics of the acoustic channel. Currently we have long delays, frequency-dependent attenuation as well as relatively long reach for acoustic signals (Domingo, 2008).
There are various environmental conditions affecting the underwater communications. Communication signals propagating through the surf zone are usually affected by scattering from the reflection from the sea‐floor and absorption, the surface gravity waves as well as scattering by the clouds of bubbles from the breaking surf. In addition, the shoaling gravity wave creates focal regions in the surface reflected wavefronts, thereby producing systematic variations in the wavefront travel times.
With thorough research cheap computing with lower cost of advanced acoustic technology, communication and sensing, will help in exploring underwater sensing applications. There has been advanced research on underwater sensor networks although there are various challenges that still demand to be solved in future. With the development of various new approaches to communication, effective analysis as well as integration and testing of these ideas is paramount.
- Berger, C. R., Zhou, S., Preisig, J. C., & Willett, P. (2010). Sparse channel estimation for multicarrier underwater acoustic communication: From subspace methods to compressed sensing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(3), 1708-1721.
- Cella U. M., Johnstone R., Shuley N. (2009) Electromagnetic wave wireless communication in shallow water coastal environment: theoretical analysis and experimental results. In Proc.4th ACM Int. Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNet), Berkeley, CA, November 2009, 9:1–9:8, ACM.
- Cheng, X., Shu, H., Liang, Q., & Du, D. H. C. (2008). Silent positioning in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on vehicular technology, 57(3), 1756-1766.
- Chitre, M., Shahabudeen, S., & Stojanovic, M. (2008). Underwater acoustic communications and networking: Recent advances and future challenges. Marine technology society journal, 42(1), 103-116.
- Domingo, M. C. (2008). Overview of channel models for underwater wireless communication networks. Physical Communication, 1(3), 163-182.
- Farr N., Bowen A., Ware J., Pontbriand C., Tivey M. (2010) An integrated, underwater optical/acoustic communications system. In IEEE Oceans Conf., Sydney, Australia, May 2010, 1–6, IEEE.
- Freitag, L., Stojanovic, M., Singh, S., & Johnson, M. (2001). Analysis of channel effects on direct-sequence and frequency-hopped spread-spectrum acoustic communication. IEEE journal of oceanic engineering, 26(4), 586-593.
- Friedman J., Torres D., Schmid T., Dong J., Srivastava M. B. (2010) A biomimetic quasi-static electric field physical channel for underwater ocean networks. In Proc. 5th ACM Int. Workshop on Underwater Networks (WUWNet), Woods Hole, MA, September 2010. ACM.
- Gorodetskaya, E., & Malekhanov, A. (2005, May). Large-array signal processing of the discrete spectrum signals: basic aspects and simulations. In Antenna Theory and Techniques, 2005. 5th International Conference on (pp. 257-259). IEEE.
- Green, D. (2010, September). In Situ data extraction from ocean sensors. In OCEANS 2010 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
- Guo, Z., Luo, H., Hong, F., Yang, M., & Ni, L. M. (2010). Current progress and research issues in underwater sensor networks. Jisuanji Yanjiu yu Fazhan/Computer Research and Development, 47(3), 377.
- Han, J. W., Ju, H. J., Kim, K. M., Chun, S. Y., & Dho, K. C. (2008, April). A study on the cooperative diversity technique with amplify and forward for underwater wireless communication. In OCEANS 2008-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Ocean (pp. 1-3). IEEE.
- Kang, T., & Iltis, R. A. (2008). Iterative carrier frequency offset and channel estimation for underwater acoustic OFDM systems. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 26(9).
- Krishnamoorthy, N. R., & Suriyakala, C. D. (2017). Performance of Underwater Acoustic Channel using modified TCM OFDM coding techniques.
- Labrador, Y., Karimi, M., Pan, D., & Miller, J. (2009). Modulation and error correction in the underwater acoustic communication channel. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 9(7), 123-130.
- Lee, W., Jeon, J. H., & Park, S. J. (2014, September). Micro-modem for short-range underwater communication systems. In Oceans-St. John’s, 2014 (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
- Li, Y., Huang, H., & Wang, Z. (2012, December). FPGA design and implementation of pulse shaping filter for coherent underwater communication. In Computer Science and Network Technology (ICCSNT), 2012 2nd International Conference on (pp. 748-752). IEEE.
- Lucani, D. E., Stojanovic, M., & Médard, M. (2008, April). On the relationship between transmission power and capacity of an underwater acoustic communication channel. In OCEANS 2008-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Ocean (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
- Manjula, R. B., & Manvi, S. S. (2011). Issues in underwater acoustic sensor networks. International Journal of Computer and Electrical Engineering, 3(1), 101.
- Nasri, N., Kachouri, A., Andrieux, L., & Samet, M. (2008, November). Design considerations for wireless underwater communication transceiver. In Signals, Circuits and Systems, 2008. SCS 2008. 2nd International Conference on (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
- Oubei, H. M., Zedini, E., ElAfandy, R. T., Kammoun, A., Abdallah, M., Ng, T. K., … & Ooi, B. S. (2017). Simple statistical channel model for weak temperature-induced turbulence in underwater wireless optical communication systems. Optics Letters, 42(13), 2455-2458.
- Pompili, D., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2009). Overview of networking protocols for underwater wireless communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(1), 97-102.
- Sahu, S. K., & Shanmugam, P. (2018). A theoretical study on the impact of particle scattering on the channel characteristics of underwater optical communication system. Optics Communications, 408, 3-14.
- Shen, X., Huang, J., Chang, J., & Zhou, Q. (2006). Dynamic modulation and bandwidth optimization for uuv underwater acoustic communication system. In Signal Processing, 2006 8th International Conference on (Vol. 3). IEEE.
- Singer, A. C., Nelson, J. K., & Kozat, S. S. (2009). Signal processing for underwater acoustic communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 47(1), 90-96.
- Stojanovic, M. (2007). On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel. ACM SIGMOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 11(4), 34-43.
- Trubuil, J., Goalic, A., & Beuzelin, N. (2012, October). An overview of channel coding for underwater acoustic communications. In MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCE, 2012-MILCOM 2012 (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
- Tuna, G., & Gungor, V. C. (2017). A survey on deployment techniques, localization algorithms, and research challenges for underwater acoustic sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems, 30(17).
- Tunnicliffe V., Barnes C., Dewey R. (2008) Major advances in cabled ocean observatories (VENUS and NEPTUNE Canada) in coastal and deep sea settings. IEEE/OES US/EU Baltic Int. Symp., Tallinn, Estonia, May 2008, 1–7, IEEE.
- Vasilescu I., Kotay K., Rus D., Dunbabin M., Corke P. (2005) Data collection, storage, and retrieval with an underwater sensor network. In Proc. 3rd ACM SenSys Conf., San Diego, CA, November 2005, 154–165, ACM.
- Vuran, M. C., & Akyildiz, I. F. (2008, April). Cross-layer packet size optimization for wireless terrestrial, underwater, and underground sensor networks. In INFOCOM 2008. The 27th Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE (pp. 226-230). IEEE.
- Wasserblat, M., & Tabrikian, J. (2000). Underwater acoustic communications using a-priori statistics on channel time-variations. In Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2000. ICASSP’00. Proceedings. 2000 IEEE International Conference on (Vol. 5, pp. 2689-2692). IEEE.